They aren’t saying ‘no evidence’ anymore— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) November 26, 2020
They’re saying they don’t like the evidence
Note the narrative shift
HUGE! Georgia Election Lawsuit: Dominion Software was Accessed by Chinese and Iranian Agents to Manipulate Election @SidneyPowell1 @RealDonaldTrump @RudyGiuliani via @gatewaypundit https://t.co/hNYVDogMux— Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) November 26, 2020
Twitter Now Showing "Unsafe Link" Warning Messages for Sidney Powell's Website -- Blocks Americans from Seeing MASSIVE Voter Fraud @SidneyPowell1 @RealDonaldTrump @JackPosobiec via @gatewaypundit https://t.co/1SFzQboueD— Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) November 26, 2020
These people are animals— Jim Hanson 🇺🇸 (@JimHansonDC) November 26, 2020
It's a public legal filing
They want to suppress it
Read this excellent analysis of it https://t.co/u86dpaHqCc
& download the document
Just to fight the #ThoughtPolice https://t.co/tGYojaeV8O
This is the same Twitter that shut down discourse about their preferred candidate BEFORE the election so it should surprise no one that they would continue their tyrannical suppression of free speech.— Dov Hikind (@HikindDov) November 26, 2020
I just joined #Parler @ DovHikind!
Say hello or comment with your handle. https://t.co/MHGTZqbd9Q
BREAKING: They cheated, they cheated, they cheated... the evidence is NOT just in the proof of voting machine and mate night ballot drops. But in nearly every measurable aspect of the race... see for YOURself: https://t.co/mq1X67tHjT— Kevin McCullough (@KMCRadio) November 27, 2020
Full Link: https://t.co/i3ItTs3opo— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) November 26, 2020
2/ including putting ballots in the wrong stacks en masse, pre-printed ballots that were “pristine” and unlined; blocking Republican observers from vote-tabulation tables; counting votes after the so-called “pipe burst” election night even though there were no Rep. observers.../— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) November 26, 2020
4/ These are serious allegations, and maybe the evidence (some of it filed and some of it under seal provisionally) will persuade. Either of these big themes would be enough to change the election results given the narrow margin for Biden. To me, the easiest way to reach that...— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) November 26, 2020
6/ which can easily be checked against the other state’s records. This accounts for thousands of votes. The other category @MattBraynard has researched & documented, is thousands of identifiable, specific registrations at fraudulent addresses such as P.O. Boxes, non-residential/ pic.twitter.com/UF3fUvqvlk— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) November 26, 2020
8/ it really isn’t. How are you supposed to allege that someone cast a ballot from a fraudulent registration address or after moving, before the election? This is something that can only be checked after the votes are cast and tallied, particularly where last-minute registrations— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) November 26, 2020
10/ which thousands of specific, identifiable people illegally cast ballots in Georgia. I hope the federal court allows inquiry into this low-tech challenge even if it does not bite on the more expert-and statistically-based theories. There’s time to get this right, and we must.— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) November 26, 2020
Vote Pattern Analysis Threadhttps://t.co/gngW74pRUt— Shylock Holmes (@shylockh) November 25, 2020
This article does something very interesting – quantifying how weird the middle of the night updates in Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia were. I want to explain in simple terms what it does, and why it’s so important.
You know, like normal countries do in their elections! And lo and behold, everyone went to bed thinking Trump had won, and woke up to find out he apparently hadn’t. (4/N) But we want to measure just how weird the outcome of these updates was. The piece does a sophisticated way of measuring this, but the concept is pretty simple. An vote update can either be a) large, or b) unlike what came before, but it is hard to be both at once. (5/N) For instance, suppose I flip a coin 10,000 times. It comes up 5,022 heads. If I flip it only twice more, it’s easy to get an update that is small but unrepresentative – say, 100% heads from 2/2 flips. (6/N) But if I flip it another 1,000 times, it is very strange to also get 100% heads in the new batch. The more flips you have, the smaller the variation in the sample mean becomes. Updates that are large are likely to be more representative. (7/N) Now, with coins, we know for sure that the distribution is the same before and after. With votes, we don’t. Counties differ from each other, and some report in different orders. (8/N) But if each county reports its tallies in small increments at quasi random times as new numbers come in, *it turns out this relationship roughly holds in real world vote counts too*, as the analysis shows. (9/N) It holds in the 2020 election data for most states and most updates. Those with an urban/rural divide. Those who vote Democrat overall and those who vote Republican overall. (10/N)
Recall, these are the places where election night saw complete banana republic stuff like boarding up windows in Wayne County vote counting centers to stop people who’d been excluded from the room even looking in.https://t.co/IQCm3D0cVO— Shylock Holmes (@shylockh) November 25, 2020
The simplest way to show this is with this is with the graph of all vote updates, standardized by the overall state vote for Biden (that is, comparing the deviation of the new batch from the state average).— Shylock Holmes (@shylockh) November 25, 2020
This graph is complicated, but what’s it saying? The x-axis is the total net votes for Biden, relative to the size of the state total. Think of this as a rough measure of the size of the update. (13/N) Big positive numbers are big total vote increases in a way that favors for Biden. Big negative numbers are big total vote increases for trump. Zero is updates that don’t move the net margin very much. So big positive or negative just means “large”. (14/N)
The y-axis is the relative ratio of support for Biden to Trump in that update. Big positive numbers show updates that are unusually tilted towards Biden, compared with what came before. Big negative numbers are updates that are unusually tilted towards Trump. (15/N)
Now, what does the main mass of blue points show? It basically looks like a cross. This is exactly the point made above. (16/N)
The vertical bit of the cross is updates that are small in total, but show various weird ratios for each candidate. This is when you flip the coin twice. If you’re high OR low on the y-axis (i.e. the batch is unrepresentative), it’s generally near zero (i.e. it’s small). (17/N)
The horizontal axis is when you flip the coin thousands of times. Most such updates are close to the prior mean. If you’re in the left or right of the x-axis (it’s a big update favoring either candidate), you’re generally close to 0 on the y-axis (you’re representative). (18/N)
Remember, this is also measured relative to other small updates in the same state, including those from the same county!— Shylock Holmes (@shylockh) November 25, 2020
1.An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump (21/N) 2.An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump (22/N) 3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump (23/N)
Another way to see just how weird these are is to plot the product of the two measures. The decisive updates are crazy outliers here.— Shylock Holmes (@shylockh) November 25, 2020
So this raises a question – why would these states, unlike everywhere else in the data, wait until the middle of the night to release massive, unrepresentative counts from the Democratic strongholds in their state, when no other state does this? (26/N)
Two reasons. First, because most other counties in the state have already reported in. As a consequence, you know how many votes you need to make up. And when you’re large AND reporting in last, it’s very hard for other counties to swing the outcome. (26(27)/N)
We saw with Montgomery County, that when you release multiple updates, it’s much easier to tell when the distribution changes halfway through. When you release it all at once, it’s much more difficult to prove what’s going on. https://t.co/hhJc4Hm3f3— Shylock Holmes (@shylockh) November 25, 2020
Finally, the report does something I haven’t seen anywhere else. It shows that if these updates were just a little more plausible in this joint property, and a little less suspicious, *the total outcome of the election gets flipped*. (30/N)
In other words, it literally matters for the entire Presidency of the United States whether these magnitudes for this handful of updates is excessively implausible, or just highly unlikely. (31/N)
Vox Popoli: Mailvox: A second opinion https://t.co/iZnMgvxL75— Coyotecounsel (@Coyotecounsel2) November 26, 2020
This is a 104-page complaint, a firehose of information and allegations from a very big-time lawyer. Anyone who tells you this is suit nothing or that they've grasped this entire complaint after one night of reading is lying. This is going to take all weekend for most intelligent people to read and grasp, including lawyers. I've not even completed reading it, I'm taking it slow.
It's now blindingly obvious why the Trump campaign disassociated from Powell a few days ago: they wanted this lawsuit to be officially unrelated to the campaign and its finances. Trump and his campaign are not parties she's representing here, she's representing electors in GA. Far from throwing her under the bus, they deliberately made her a completely free radical, unencumbered by campaign rules and regulations and Swamp oversight....she's outside the system....
From comments: Yeah I wondered about paragraph 14 as well. Former MIL intel person, hmmm...
- Former, but now or just very recently working for the NSA? - Does this imply that they (NSA) captured real-time data going to and from the Dominion counting sytems? - Redacted? So there is probably top secret or compartmentalized info from an ongoing or recently completed security operation? Which also implies that the former MIL is still working in some capacity for a government agency capable of detecting this sort of data.
The testimony of this person alone could blow the walls out and bring the roof down.
Here's the source. Twitter Stasi won't allow the link so you'll have to copy and paste to make it work. defendingtherepublic[DOT]org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf— Pelosi’s Liver (Kraken-Elect) (@PelosisLiver) November 26, 2020
Military Information Expert: These systems allow authorized and unauthorized users to cancel votes, shift votes, preload votes vote blank ballots, all in real time: Read his actual testimony: https://t.co/lkszG50sP5 pic.twitter.com/VM3gZWp13v— 🇺🇸 GELLER REPORT 🇺🇸 (@PamelaGeller) November 25, 2020
Two-thirds of Americans back Trump's recount efforts: pollhttps://t.co/rLycDOR1RU— Barrett Wilson (@BarrettWilson6) November 26, 2020